The Chhattisgarh High Court stated that a mistake in a surname on a certificate issued by a competent authority does not necessarily mean impersonation or providing false information.
The Chhattisgarh High Court observed that mere inadvertent errors in surnames on certificates issued by a competent authority do not indicate impersonation or providing false information. This decision came after the Age Determination Committee refused to consider certificates produced by the petitioner, Arjun Lal, with different surnames. Justice Goutam Bhaduri's bench stated, "Mere inadvertent mentioning or non-mentioning of a surname in a certificate issued by the competent authority would not mean and indicate that it is a case of impersonation or furnishing false information."
The petitioner, who joined South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in 1984, had requested a correction of his date of birth due to an inadvertent recording error. After filing a Writ Petition in 2013, the petitioner approached the Age Determination Committee, which issued an order and a corrigendum that the petitioner challenged in court.
The Court referred to clauses (B) and (C) of II No.76, which specify that the review of the determination of an employee's date of birth shall consider matriculation or higher secondary certificates issued by recognized universities or boards before the date of employment.
The Court noted that the petitioner submitted the Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination, 1978, issued before his employment, to the ADC. However, the ADC sidelined this certificate due to surname variations. The Court emphasized that the alleged mismatch in the petitioner's surname did not warrant rejection of his candidature, as there was no indication of forgery or procurement of documents.
Citing the case Bharat Coking Coal Limited and Others v Chhota Birsa Uran, the Court highlighted that a wronged employee should not be denied rights, especially when adhering to prescribed procedures to avoid litigation.
As a result, the Court set aside the earlier order and corrigendum, allowing the petitioner's petition.
Comments