Minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of the prosecutrix should not be a ground for rejecting an otherwise credible prosecution case.
"Minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of the prosecutrix should not be a ground for rejecting an otherwise credible prosecution case." In this context, the court is emphasizing that small inconsistencies in the testimony of the victim (prosecutrix) do not diminish the overall reliability of her account, especially when it is corroborated by other substantial evidence. The Chhattisgarh High Court, in a notable judgment, upheld the conviction of Dulamani Yadav for the rape of a minor under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The ruling, delivered by Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, emphasized that minor inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony do not undermine the credibility of her account. The case highlights important legal issues, including the sufficiency of victim testimony, the establishment of the victim’s age, and the applicability of various laws in cases ...