Skip to main content

The High Court should exercise caution and refrain from interfering with findings based on evidence on record unless there is a ground of perversity, the findings contradict the evidence, or there is a technical flaw in the conduct of the departmental enquiry.

The statement emphasizes the importance of judicial restraint and prudence by the High Court when reviewing administrative or departmental findings. Here's an explanation of each aspect mentioned:

1. **Ground of Perversity:** Perversity refers to a decision that is so irrational or unreasonable that no reasonable person would come to the same conclusion. In legal terms, a decision is considered perverse when it goes against the weight of evidence or defies logic. The High Court should intervene if it finds that the decision under review is perversely made, indicating a clear departure from rational decision-making.

2. **Contradiction with Evidence:** If the findings of the administrative or departmental body contradict the evidence presented during the proceedings, it raises doubts about the integrity and reliability of those findings. In such cases, the High Court may step in to rectify inconsistencies and ensure that decisions are based on factual evidence rather than arbitrary or contradictory reasoning.

3. **Technical Flaw in Conducting Enquiry:** A departmental enquiry must adhere to procedural fairness and follow established norms and principles. If there are technical flaws in the conduct of the enquiry, such as procedural irregularities, bias, or violation of natural justice principles, the High Court has a duty to address these issues and rectify any unfairness in the process.

By highlighting these grounds, the statement underscores the principle that the High Court's intervention should be limited to situations where there are serious deficiencies in the administrative or departmental findings. This approach ensures that the judiciary respects the autonomy and expertise of administrative bodies while also safeguarding the rights of individuals against arbitrary or unjust decisions.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WELCOME ADDRESS OF HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT THE INAUGURAL FUNCTION OF STATE LEVEL CONFERENCE OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS OF CHHATTISGARH.

Respected Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, Judges, Supreme Court of India, sitting on the dias; My esteemed Sister and Brother Judges; Registrar General and Officers of the Registry; All the Judges of  the District Judiciary; Other Distinguished Guests present; Ladies and Gentlemen; Persons from Print and Electronic Media, A Very Good Morning to All It is a great honour and privilege for me to welcome Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Judge, Supreme Court of India, who has been kind enough to accept our invitation for his gracious presence in this Conference.  His Lordship’s inspiring life, marked by perseverance and integrity, serves as a guiding light for many aspiring Lawyers, Judges and Jurists across the Country, demonstrating that unwavering determination and hard-work can lead to the highest echelons of the judiciary. His Lordship’s willingness and readiness for t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reported Judgments

Party Name Case No. Date of Decision Hon'ble Judges/Coram (SB/DB) Chetan Lal v. State Of Chhattisgarh CRA No. 250 of 2003 01.08.2019 Gautam Chourdiya, J. Harnam Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh CRA No. 1942 of 1998 29.08.2019 Gautam Chourdiya, J. Suresh Chand Tripathi and Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh CRA No. 2658 of 1997 19.09.2019 Gautam Chourdiya, J. Sanjay and Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh CRA No. 752 of 2012 23.10.2019 Prashant Kumar Mishra and Gautam Chourdiya , JJ.
Post a Comment
Read more

Hon’ble Chief Justice Shri Ramesh Sinha conducted a virtual inspection of the National Lok Adalat across 23 District Courts of the Chhattisgarh State.

Bilaspur, September 21st, 2024: This year’s third National Lok Adalat was successfully organized on September 21, 2024, across the state under the able guidance of Hon’ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice of the High Court of Chhattisgarh and Patron-in-Chief of the Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority. This National Lok Adalat spanned judicial levels from the Taluka courts to the High Court, making justice more approachable and swifter. To boost the morale of Judicial Officers and instill a strengthened sense of security and faith in the institution of Lok Adalat among citizens, the Hon’ble Chief Justice virtually connected with all 23 District Courts of the State from the High Court. He interacted with Principal District Judges and Judicial Officers, encouraging them to ensure the successful resolution of disputes in the National Lok Adalat. His engagement was pivotal to the success of the event, as he shared insights, assessed ongoing proceedings, and inspi...
Post a Comment
Read more