Skip to main content

Posts

हाई कोर्ट ने पार्किंग के बगैर बनाए कांप्लेक्स को ढहाने पर लगाई रोक

हाई कोर्ट ने पार्किंग के बगैर बनाए कांप्लेक्स को ढहाने पर लगाई रोक रात 9 बजे वेब से याचिका, 11.40 पर अप्रूवल सुबह दस्तावेज जमा किए, 8 बजे से सुनवाई बिलासपुर के नूतन चौक पर नगर निगम से लीज पर ली गई जमीन पर पार्किंग के बगैर कांप्लेक्स बनाया गया है। निगम से स्वीकृत नक्शे के अनुसार पार्किंग के लिए जगह छोड़ी जानी थी, लेकिन ऐसा नहीं किया गया। निगम ने शुक्रवार को नोटिस जारी कर 24 घंटे के भीतर अवैध निर्माण हटाने को कहा था। ऐसा नहीं करने पर शनिवार की सुबह अवैध निर्माण ढहाने की तैयारी थी, लेकिन शुक्रवार की रात याचिका लगाई गई, जिस पर शनिवार की सुबह 8 बजे सुनवाई हुई। इस दौरान याचिकाकर्ता ने अवैध निर्माण हटाने / बदलाव करने समय देने की मांग की। हाई कोर्ट के जस्टिस राकेश मोहन पाण्डेय की बेंच ने तीन सप्ताह का समय देते हुए इस दौरान कार्रवाई करने पर रोक लगा दी है। जबड़ापारा, सरकंडा निवासी हरीश राठौर को नूतन चौक पर नगर निगम ने 2377 स्क्वेयर फीट जमीन लीज पर दी है। 20 जनवरी 2023 को लीज पर जमीन मिलने के बाद राठौर ने यहां शॉपिंग कांप्लेक्स बनाने के लिए नगर निगम में नक्शे की मंजूरी के लिए आवेदन दिया। निगम ने ...

High Court of Chhattisgarh has directed to explore the possibilities with regard to implementation of concept of Open Jail and whether the same would be possible in the State of Chhattisgarh or not. in WP (PIL) No.18 of 2024

High Court of Chhattisgarh has directed to explore the possibilities with regard to implementation of concept of Open Jail and whether the same would be possible in the State of Chhattisgarh or not. in WP (PIL) No.18 of 2024 The Division Bench comprising of the Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Mr. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal of High Court of Chhattisgarh, perused the letters written from the relatives of a convict, namely, Mohd. Ansari stating that Mohd. Ansari is a convict and confined in jail since 2010 in regard of offenses under Section 302 of LPC and his appeal is pending since 2014. However, on perusal of record it transpired that said criminal appeal has been dismissed on 21.04 2023 affirming the order of the learned Trial Court. It has been further stated in the letters that because of confinement of the sole bread earner, they are living a life in misery. Pursuant to aforesaid letters, data have been called from Central Jails and District Jails situated in the State of Chha...

INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY' BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR, ON 07.03.2024 AT DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, DURG

SPEECH ON "INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY' BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR, ON 07.03.2024 AT DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, DURG President, District Bar Association Durg and Members of the Executive Body, District Judge, Durg and Judicial Officers of the District Judiciary, Learned members of the Bar Ladies and Gentlemen Namaste and a very good evening to everyone present here. As you all know that this evening we have gathered here to share our gratitude towards our women on this occasion of International Women's Day. I feel delighted to address the gathering of Advocates and Judges of District Judiciary in the vibrant district of Durg. International Women's Day is celebrated on 8th March every year. It is an opportunity to commemorate women's social, economic, cultural and political achievements and highlights the need to continue accelerating gender equality. The history of the day dates back to the ...

High Court of Chhattisgarh

The High Court of Chhattisgarh is the High Court for the state of Chhattisgarh, which was established on 1 November 2000, when the state of Chhattisgarh was carved out of the state of Madhya Pradesh. The High Court of Chhattisgarh is located in the city of Bilaspur. The High Court of Chhattisgarh has jurisdiction over the state of Chhattisgarh, and has original and appellate jurisdiction over civil and criminal matters. The court also has the power to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. The High Court of Chhattisgarh has a Chief Justice and several other judges. The Chief Justice of the High Court of Chhattisgarh is appointed by the President of India in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of Chhattisgarh. The High Court of Chhattisgarh has several benches, which are located in different parts of the state to facilitate the speedy and efficient delivery of justice. The main bench of the High Court o...

Legal Institution in India

India has a consisting of a variety of legal institutions. Here are the main types of legal institutions in India: 1. Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the country, and has the power to hear appeals from all lower courts in civil and criminal cases. The Supreme Court is located in New Delhi. 2. High Courts: Each state in India has a High Court, which is the highest judicial authority in the state. High Courts have original and appellate jurisdiction over both civil and criminal matters. They also have the power to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. 3. District Courts: Each district in India has a district court, which has jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases within the district. District courts are presided over by a district judge, who is assisted by additional district judges, sub-judges, and magistrates. 4. Tribunals: Tribunals are specialized courts that have been ...

Notable civil cases in India

India has seen several notable civil cases in recent years, involving a wide range of issues such as corporate disputes, property disputes, and public interest litigation. Here are some of the most notable civil cases in India: 1. Vodafone tax case (2012): This case involved a dispute between the Indian government and Vodafone, a multinational telecommunications company, over a tax liability of over $2 billion. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Vodafone. 2. Satyam Computers accounting fraud case (2009): This case involved a major accounting fraud at Satyam Computers, one of India's largest IT companies, in which the company's founder and chairman inflated the company's revenues and profits. The case resulted in several convictions and hefty fines. 3. Shah Bano case (1985): This case involved a Muslim woman who was divorced by her husband and was denied maintenance by him. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Shah Bano...

Most notable criminal cases in India

There are a large number of criminal cases in India, ranging from minor offenses such as traffic violations to serious crimes like murder, rape, and terrorism. Here are some of the most notable criminal cases in India in recent years: 1. Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case (2012): This case involved the brutal gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman on a bus in Delhi, which sparked widespread protests and led to changes in Indian rape laws. 2. Bhopal gas tragedy (1984): This was one of the worst industrial disasters in history, in which toxic gas leaked from a pesticide plant, causing the deaths of thousands of people and injuring hundreds of thousands more. 3. Mumbai terrorist attacks (2008): This case involved a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Mumbai by a Pakistan-based militant group, which killed over 160 people and injured more than 300 others. 4. Aarushi-Hemraj double murder case (2008): This case involved the murder of a 14-year-old girl and her family's...

Meaning of High Court in India

In India, the High Court is a court of record with original and appellate jurisdiction. It is the highest judicial authority in each state or union territory. The High Court has the power to hear and decide on a wide range of civil and criminal cases, including constitutional matters, disputes between the state and central governments, disputes between two states, and cases of public interest. It also has the power to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. The High Court is headed by the Chief Justice, who is appointed by the President of India in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and other senior judges. The High Court also has several other judges, whose number is determined by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice. The decisions of the High Court are binding on all subordinate courts within its jurisdiction. However, the Supreme Court of India has the power to overrule the decisions of the High Cour...

Difference between Lawyer, Advocate and Barister

Lawyer, advocate, and barrister are all legal professionals, but there are some differences in their roles and titles depending on the jurisdiction. In general, a lawyer is someone who is trained in the law and has been admitted to practice by a court or bar association. Lawyers provide legal advice and representation to clients, and their duties can include drafting legal documents, negotiating settlements, and representing clients in court. An advocate is a legal professional who appears in court on behalf of their clients. Advocates are typically found in common law jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, India, and South Africa, where they are responsible for presenting arguments to the court on behalf of their clients. In some jurisdictions, the term "advocate" is used interchangeably with "barrister." A barrister is a type of advocate who specializes in representing clients in court. Barristers are typically found in countries such as the United Kingdom, ...

Jumping bail - Applicant not deserve any sympathy

No Sympathy for Jumping Bail Educational, Technical & Legal information for All Jumping bail - Applicant not deserve any sympathy  Jumping bail refers to the act of a defendant failing to appear in court as required after being released on bail. This is a serious offense as it not only violates the conditions of bail but also obstructs justice by impeding the court's ability to hear and decide the case. While each case is unique and requires individual consideration, in general, the act of jumping bail demonstrates a lack of respect for the legal system and the rule of law. It suggests a willingness to evade responsibility and avoid facing the consequences of one's actions. As such, it can be difficult to sympathize with someone who jumps bail, as they have chosen to ignore their obligations and have intentionally caused additional problems for themselves and the legal system. It is important to remember that bail is a privilege, not a right. It is granted to a defendant to...